How Good Interviews Become Bad Hires: Hiring Style

dv1959057Last week, I discussed how a phenomenon called inattentional blindness leads us to focus so much on what we want to see that we fail to see the obvious. This in turn can cause seemingly good interviews to turn into bad hires. Adding to that are differing leadership and hiring styles.

Different leadership styles further complicate the situation. Your leadership style narrows your perceptive ability and exacerbates your perceptual blindness. Your personality, expertise, and experiences shape your leadership style, which naturally, in turn, shapes your hiring style. Your hiring style ultimately affects your particular flavor of perceptual blindness, so it’s important to understand what your hiring style is. When you understand your hiring style, you can remove the blinders from your eyes and avoid making bad hires.

Hiring Styles

There are four main hiring styles.

The Tackler. Tacklers are fast and decisive. They want to be in control and reach goals quickly. During interviews, they get to the point quickly and appreciate people who do the same. Tacklers tend to hire candidates they think will condense timelines and hit targets fast.

The Teller. Tellers are talkers. They use their communication skills to motivate people. During interviews they talk a lot, often selling the candidate on the company and potential opportunities. Tellers tend to hire candidates they think will act upon what the Teller has said.

The Tailor. Tailors are collaborators. They point out that there’s no “I” in “team.” During interviews they build a rapport and allow conversation to become an open exchange of thoughts and feelings. Tailors tend to hire candidates they think are capable of cultivating strong workplace relationships.

The Tester. Testers are data-driven. They thrive on clarity. They make decisions based on tangible evidence. During interviews, they gather pertinent details and value facts over stories. Testers tend to hire candidates who offer quantitative evidence that they’re right for the job.

PREMIUM CONTENT: Most Attractive Staffing Markets Globally 2016

Knowledge in Action

The good news is that none of these styles is bad. They’re all good, actually. They’re what make us who we are. The bad news is that when we rely too much on our dominant style, it distorts reality. Our subjective perception, imperfect to begin with, gets even worse. We create opinions and beliefs about candidates that may or may not be true.

This is hiring blindness in a nutshell. We don’t see the real person. We see the person we set ourselves up to see. We see the person we want to see. Just like when we’re on first and second dates. We miss the red flags. We miss the gorillas walking by because we want the person to be the right fit.

This is how good dates become bad relationships, and how good interviews become bad hires.

When you recognize the downstream effects of your hiring style, you can limit its negative aspects and leverage strategies that counter hiring blindness.

“Understanding hiring styles is a game-changer when it comes to identifying top talent,” says Sharon Strauss, vice president of client services at Vitamin T, a talent agency that serves creative digital professionals. “Having worked with thousands of hiring managers across the country, I have been amazed when really smart leaders couldn’t see or hear what I do. Over time I’ve realized that it’s simply practice and a structured approach that helps avoid mismatches, and the fact we do this all day long has helped! Anyone who is unaware of hiring blindness and how their hiring style affects this issue will continue to make the same hiring mistakes.”

Here’s an easy-to-follow, three step approach, structured to mitigate the distortive impact of hiring styles and reduce hiring blindness:

  1. Determine your hiring style. Use the descriptions above to become familiar with the different hiring styles, then carefully watch for evidence of them during future interviews to identify your dominant style.
  2. Recognize your blind spots. Blind spots hamper effective interviewing. Tacklers see drive, Tellers see buy-in to the company mission, Tailors see potential collaborators, and Testers see details. All four styles tend to miss things the others see. These are critical blind spots that lead to bad hires.
  3. Incorporate seeing-eye colleagues. It’s important to stack your hiring team with people of all four styles. This will give you an expansive, three hundred-sixty degree view of a candidate. A diverse, complementary team rarely misses important cues. Someone will see that gorilla walking by while the others are watching the ball.

It’s true that dating and hiring are similar processes. There’s one important difference, though: companies don’t have time for an extended courtship when they have an important seat to fill. As the speed of business increases, the precision and accuracy of the hiring process must keep pace. Companies have to create streamlined processes for identifying top talent quickly. If they don’t, the high divorce rate between bosses and employees will only increase.

MORE: What to consider when resigning

Scott Wintrip

Scott Wintrip
Scott Wintrip is the president of the Wintrip Consulting Group. He was named to the Staffing 100 by Staffing Industry Analysts in 2011-2016 and was among the first class of the Staffing 100 Hall of Fame in 2017. He can be reached at scott (at) ScottWintrip (dot) com.

Scott Wintrip

Share This Post


Recent Articles

Powered by ·